Mortgage Express v McDonnell [2001] EWCA Civ 887 (22 May 2001)

Mortgage Express v McDonnell [2001] EWCA Civ 887 (22 May 2001)

The doctrine of illegality does not bar Mrs McDonnell's claim to an equitable interest in the property because she does not have to rely on the illegality to establish her interest; the money contributed was hers, and the acquisition of the property did not involve new illegality. Mortgage Express is entitled to subrogation to the extent of sums advanced to pay off Midland Bank's charge, but not beyond that. Equitable accounting issues remain to be resolved as to the division of any surplus after sale.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 887
Parties
Claimant: Mortgage Express; Appellant/defendant: Sandra McDonnell; Defendant: Keith Robson; Defendant: Paul McDonnell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Order Granting Possession
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Illegality in Trusts, Subrogation, Overriding Interests, Equitable Accounting, Beneficial Ownership, Mortgage Fraud
Property Law Equity Civil Procedure Illegality in Trusts Subrogation Overriding Interests Equitable Accounting Beneficial Ownership +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mortgage Express

Claimant

Sandra McDonnell

Appellant/defendant

Keith Robson

Defendant

Paul McDonnell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Order Granting Possession

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the doctrine of illegality bars Mrs McDonnell's claim to an equitable interest in the property
  2. 2 Whether Mortgage Express is entitled to subrogation to Midland Bank's rights
  3. 3 How equitable accounting should be conducted regarding the proceeds of sale

Ratio Decidendi

The doctrine of illegality does not bar Mrs McDonnell's claim to an equitable interest in the property because she does not have to rely on the illegality to establish her interest; the money contributed was hers, and the acquisition of the property did not involve new illegality. Mortgage Express is entitled to subrogation to the extent of sums advanced to pay off Midland Bank's charge, but not beyond that. Equitable accounting issues remain to be resolved as to the division of any surplus after sale.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order for possession stands but subject to equitable accounting and subrogation principles as set out in the judgment.
  • Matter may be remitted to County Court for resolution of outstanding equitable accounting issues if parties cannot agree.