Lindsay v Wood [2006] EWHC 2895 (QB) (16 November 2006)
The Claimant, due to his brain injury, is unable to deal with the advice he is likely to receive or to give reliably rational instructions based on that advice. He is therefore a patient within the meaning of Part VII of the Mental Health Act 1983 and CPR Part 21.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2895
- Parties
- Claimant: Kunal Karl Lindsay; Defendant: Kenneth Arnold Wood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Preliminary Issue on Capacity
- Outcome
- Claimant found to be a patient within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983 and CPR Part 21.
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Conduct Litigation, Management of Damages, Definition of 'patient' Under Mental Health Act 1983, Court of Protection Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kunal Karl Lindsay
Claimant
Kenneth Arnold Wood
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Preliminary Issue on Capacity
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is a 'patient' within the meaning of Part VII of the Mental Health Act 1983 and CPR Part 21
- 2 Whether the Claimant has capacity to conduct litigation and manage damages
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant, due to his brain injury, is unable to deal with the advice he is likely to receive or to give reliably rational instructions based on that advice. He is therefore a patient within the meaning of Part VII of the Mental Health Act 1983 and CPR Part 21.
Court Disposition
Claimant found to be a patient within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983 and CPR Part 21.
Orders
- Claimant's solicitors and counsel may not take instructions from him as a person with capacity; litigation to proceed with Claimant as a patient.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment