McKenzie, R. v
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the sentences for theft are reduced from two years to one year each, consecutive to the four-year sentence for robbery, resulting in a total sentence of five years. The direction crediting 174 days on remand is quashed as it was not lawfully amended and cannot stand.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Kenneth McKenzie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Credit for Time Served, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Dangerousness, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Kenneth McKenzie
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total sentence of six years' imprisonment was excessive
- 2 Whether the sentences for theft should have been concurrent or consecutive
- 3 Whether the direction crediting 174 days on remand was lawfully amended
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the sentences for theft are reduced from two years to one year each, consecutive to the four-year sentence for robbery, resulting in a total sentence of five years. The direction crediting 174 days on remand is quashed as it was not lawfully amended and cannot stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The sentences of two years' imprisonment on each of the four counts of theft are quashed and substituted with sentences of one year's imprisonment on each count, consecutive to the four years for robbery, totaling five years' imprisonment.
- The direction that 174 days on remand are to count towards sentence is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment