Attorney General v Simmons [2003] EWHC 1694 (Admin) (26 June 2003)
The respondent has habitually and persistently, and without any reasonable ground, instituted vexatious civil proceedings and made vexatious applications in civil proceedings; the court exercises its discretion to make a Civil Proceedings Order under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 without limit of time.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 1694 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Defendant: Kenneth Simmons
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Civil Proceedings Order Under Section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Civil Proceedings Order granted under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 without limit of time.
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Civil Proceedings Order, Section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Claimant
Kenneth Simmons
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Proceedings Order Under Section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings or made vexatious applications without reasonable ground
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to make a Civil Proceedings Order under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent has habitually and persistently, and without any reasonable ground, instituted vexatious civil proceedings and made vexatious applications in civil proceedings; the court exercises its discretion to make a Civil Proceedings Order under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 without limit of time.
Court Disposition
Civil Proceedings Order granted under section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981 without limit of time.
Orders
- Order extends to proceedings in the respondent's name or in the name of any other person, including his wife.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment