Cornwall v R.
The presence of a journalist juror with publicly expressed views did not, in the circumstances, create a real possibility or danger of bias. The trial was conducted properly, and there was no evidence of partiality or unfairness. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the aggravating features and the applicant's age, and the judge's factual findings were upheld.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenny Cornwall; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence refused.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Impartiality, Murder, Sentencing, Bias, Self Defence, Provocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenny Cornwall
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the presence of a journalist juror with publicly expressed views rendered the trial unfair or conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the applicant's age and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The presence of a journalist juror with publicly expressed views did not, in the circumstances, create a real possibility or danger of bias. The trial was conducted properly, and there was no evidence of partiality or unfairness. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the aggravating features and the applicant's age, and the judge's factual findings were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence refused.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against conviction granted
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment