Kent County Council, Re B (A Child) v the Mother & Ors
The court held that prior disclosures by the mother and her solicitor of documents and summaries from the care proceedings to third parties (including the GMC, MPs, and journalists) constituted prima facie contempt of court under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960. However, the court exercised its discretion to permit disclosure of specified documents to the GMC for the purposes of investigating the mother's complaint, subject to strict confidentiality safeguards. The court also permitted the mother to disclose certain facts and an edited letter into the public domain, provided the child's and expert witnesses' identities were protected. The court refused to prohibit...
- Parties
- Applicant: Kent County Council; First Respondent: The mother; Second Respondent: The father; Third Respondent: B (by her Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings Under the Children Act 1989 / Application for Leave to Disclose Documents and Information; Post Final Care Order, Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; leave given for specified disclosures to the GMC and limited publication in the public domain, subject to restrictions.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Court Documents, Contempt of Court, Anonymity and Privacy in Family Proceedings, Freedom of Expression, Balancing Article 8 and Article 10 Rights, Expert Evidence in Child Protection Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kent County Council
Applicant
The mother
First Respondent
The father
Second Respondent
B (by her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings Under the Children Act 1989 / Application for Leave to Disclose Documents and Information; Post Final Care Order, Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother may disclose documents from care proceedings to the General Medical Council and others
- 2 Whether prior disclosures by the mother and her solicitor constituted contempt of court under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960
- 3 Whether and to what extent information about the case may be published in the public domain, balancing privacy and freedom of expression
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that prior disclosures by the mother and her solicitor of documents and summaries from the care proceedings to third parties (including the GMC, MPs, and journalists) constituted prima facie contempt of court under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960. However, the court exercised its discretion to permit disclosure of specified documents to the GMC for the purposes of investigating the mother's complaint, subject to strict confidentiality safeguards. The court also permitted the mother to disclose certain facts and an edited letter into the public domain, provided the child's and expert witnesses' identities were protected. The court refused to prohibit...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; leave given for specified disclosures to the GMC and limited publication in the public domain, subject to restrictions.
Orders
- Contra mundum injunction prohibiting publication of information likely to identify the child, her carers, or expert witnesses, but not the local authority.
- Leave for the mother to disclose specified documents to the General Medical Council for the purposes of her complaint, subject to confidentiality safeguards.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment