F and X (Children), Re

F and X (Children), Re

The court found that the children were unlawfully retained in Sudan, with a real risk of FGM to the older child, and ordered their immediate return, emphasizing the urgency and seriousness of compliance with court orders.

Parties
Applicant: Kent County Council; 1st Respondent: A; 2nd Respondent: B
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Wardship and FGM Protection Order / Judgment Following Non Compliance With Previous Order
Outcome
Order made for immediate return of children and undertakings by parties; committal proceedings anticipated if non-compliance persists.
Legal Topics
Female Genital Mutilation, Child Abduction, Inherent Jurisdiction, Wardship
Family Law Child Protection Human Rights Female Genital Mutilation Child Abduction Inherent Jurisdiction Wardship

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kent County Council

Applicant

A

1st Respondent

B

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Wardship and FGM Protection Order / Judgment Following Non Compliance With Previous Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Unlawful retention of children outside jurisdiction
  2. 2 Risk of female genital mutilation
  3. 3 Compliance with court orders

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the children were unlawfully retained in Sudan, with a real risk of FGM to the older child, and ordered their immediate return, emphasizing the urgency and seriousness of compliance with court orders.

Court Disposition

Order made for immediate return of children and undertakings by parties; committal proceedings anticipated if non-compliance persists.

Orders

  • Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order continued
  • Children made Wards of Court