Marashen Ltd v Kenvett Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 1706 (Ch) (06 July 2017)
Permission to serve out of jurisdiction must be granted before alternative service within jurisdiction can be ordered against a foreign defendant. The Hague Service Convention does not preclude alternative service within jurisdiction, but such orders should only be made in exceptional circumstances. The Master's order for alternative service was set aside because permission to serve out had not been granted, but the court granted permission to serve out and considered whether alternative service was justified under the correct threshold.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1706 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Marashen Limited; Defendant: Kenvett Limited; Third Party / Part 20 Defendant: Dmitry Ivanchenko
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Alternative Service and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Hague Service Convention, Alternative Service, Non Party Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marashen Limited
Claimant
Kenvett Limited
Defendant
Dmitry Ivanchenko
Third Party / Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Alternative Service and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to serve out of jurisdiction is required before alternative service within jurisdiction can be ordered
- 2 Whether CPR 6.15 allows alternative service within jurisdiction in Hague Service Convention cases
- 3 What threshold applies for alternative service in Hague Service Convention cases
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to serve out of jurisdiction must be granted before alternative service within jurisdiction can be ordered against a foreign defendant. The Hague Service Convention does not preclude alternative service within jurisdiction, but such orders should only be made in exceptional circumstances. The Master's order for alternative service was set aside because permission to serve out had not been granted, but the court granted permission to serve out and considered whether alternative service was justified under the correct threshold.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Order for service by alternative method set aside
- Permission granted to serve s.51 Application out of jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment