Sean Drummond v Keolis Amey Docklands Ltd
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the claimant accessed the track by opening the gate rather than sidestepping it. Therefore, the alleged failures to lock or alarm the gate were not causally relevant, and the proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were otiose.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sean Drummond; Defendant: Keolis Amey Docklands Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial on Liability Only; Application to Amend Pleadings; Discontinuance Approved
- Outcome
- Claim discontinued with no order for costs; discontinuance approved by the court.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Occupiers Liability Act 1984, Amendment of Pleadings, Causation, Discontinuance of Claim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sean Drummond
Claimant
Keolis Amey Docklands Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial on Liability Only; Application to Amend Pleadings; Discontinuance Approved
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant accessed the track by opening the gate or sidestepping it
- 2 Whether the defendant breached its duty under the Occupiers Liability Act 1984
- 3 Causal relevance of alleged failures to lock or alarm the gate
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the claimant accessed the track by opening the gate rather than sidestepping it. Therefore, the alleged failures to lock or alarm the gate were not causally relevant, and the proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were otiose.
Court Disposition
Claim discontinued with no order for costs; discontinuance approved by the court.
Orders
- Approval of discontinuance of the claim with no order for costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment