Goldfarb (Liquidator of Eurocruit Europe Ltd.) v Poppleton
The limitation period for a liquidator's claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is six years from the date of the actionable breach of duty, not from the commencement of liquidation. The applicant's claims are statute-barred as they were brought more than six years after the alleged breaches. There was no sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment by the respondent to postpone the limitation period under section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin Ashley Goldfarb; Company: Eurocruit Europe Ltd (in liquidation); Respondent: Richard Poppleton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insolvency/company) / Application to Strike Out Claim
- Outcome
- Application to strike out granted; proceedings struck out as statute-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Directors' Duties, Liquidator's Powers, Misfeasance Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Ashley Goldfarb
Applicant
Eurocruit Europe Ltd (in liquidation)
Company
Richard Poppleton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (insolvency/company) / Application to Strike Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is statute-barred by limitation.
- 2 When the limitation period begins to run for a liquidator's claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
- 3 Whether time starts to run afresh under section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980 due to alleged deliberate concealment.
Ratio Decidendi
The limitation period for a liquidator's claim under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is six years from the date of the actionable breach of duty, not from the commencement of liquidation. The applicant's claims are statute-barred as they were brought more than six years after the alleged breaches. There was no sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment by the respondent to postpone the limitation period under section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out granted; proceedings struck out as statute-barred.
Orders
- The proceedings against the respondent are struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment