R v Kevin George March

R v Kevin George March

The applicant's guilty plea was unequivocal and entered with understanding of the offence; alleged deficiencies in disclosure, investigation, or representation were not material enough to undermine the plea, and no grounds exist to vacate it.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Kevin George March
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 September 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Against Conviction, and Representation Order
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Vacating Guilty Plea, Director Liability, Health and Safety Offences, Disclosure Obligations, Representation Order
Criminal Law Health and Safety Law Corporate Law Vacating Guilty Plea Director Liability Health and Safety Offences Disclosure Obligations Representation Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Kevin George March

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Against Conviction, and Representation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be permitted to vacate his guilty plea
  2. 2 Whether deficiencies in disclosure or investigation undermine the plea
  3. 3 Whether poor legal representation justifies vacating the plea

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's guilty plea was unequivocal and entered with understanding of the offence; alleged deficiencies in disclosure, investigation, or representation were not material enough to undermine the plea, and no grounds exist to vacate it.

Court Disposition

applications refused