Brown, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 50 (22 January 2004)
The conviction was unsafe because the medical evidence, when reassessed with fresh expert input, was no longer unequivocal and could not reliably support the prosecution case; the evidence of the key prosecution expert had been discredited; and the reliability of the main witness was in doubt due to her state at the time of the incident.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Crim 50
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: Kevin John Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction After Referral by Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Offences, Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Expert Medical Evidence, Witness Reliability, Unsafe Conviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
Kevin John Brown
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction After Referral by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for rape was safe in light of fresh medical and expert evidence
- 2 Whether the evidence of the key witness was reliable given her state at the time of the alleged incident
- 3 Whether the medical findings could only be explained by sexual abuse
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was unsafe because the medical evidence, when reassessed with fresh expert input, was no longer unequivocal and could not reliably support the prosecution case; the evidence of the key prosecution expert had been discredited; and the reliability of the main witness was in doubt due to her state at the time of the incident.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction for rape quashed
- No retrial ordered due to time elapsed and sentence served
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment