McGuinness v Mawer [2021] EWHC B29 (Costs) (29 December 2021)
There is no real basis for requiring the Defendant to disclose the retainer or elect to rely on other evidence, as the bill is properly certified, the evidence provided is sufficient, and the Claimant's challenges are speculative and unfounded.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC B29 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Spencer McGuinness; Defendant: Kevin Mawer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Application for Disclosure/election Regarding Retainer
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Retainer Disclosure, Indemnity Principle, Detailed Assessment, Bankruptcy Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Spencer McGuinness
Claimant
Kevin Mawer
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Application for Disclosure/election Regarding Retainer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant should be required to elect to disclose the retainer or rely on other evidence under Practice Direction 47, paragraph 13.13
- 2 Whether the retainer is a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) and the consequences thereof
- 3 Whether there is any real basis for doubting the certification of the bill of costs
Ratio Decidendi
There is no real basis for requiring the Defendant to disclose the retainer or elect to rely on other evidence, as the bill is properly certified, the evidence provided is sufficient, and the Claimant's challenges are speculative and unfounded.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The Claimant's application for the Defendant to be put to an election as to disclosure of the retainer is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment