R (on the application of Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council and another
Deference by local inhabitants to golfers did not negate the assertion of a right. The tripartite test (nec vi, nec clam, nec precario) is sufficient. Where recreational use is open, peaceable, and without permission, it is 'as of right' even if users accommodate concurrent use by the owner. Registration does not...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kevin Paul Lewis; 1st Respondent: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; 2nd Respondent: Persimmon Homes (Teesside) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (appeal) / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Commons Act 2006, Town and Village Greens, Prescription, Public Rights, Deference Doctrine
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Paul Lewis
Appellant
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
1st Respondent
Persimmon Homes (Teesside) Ltd
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether local inhabitants' recreational use of land, which deferred to concurrent golfing use, was 'as of right' under section 15 of the Commons Act 2006 and sufficient for registration as a town or village green.
Ratio Decidendi
Deference by local inhabitants to golfers did not negate the assertion of a right. The tripartite test (nec vi, nec clam, nec precario) is sufficient. Where recreational use is open, peaceable, and without permission, it is 'as of right' even if users accommodate concurrent use by the owner. Registration does not extinguish the owner's compatible use; rights coexist subject to give and take.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council to register the disputed land as a town green under section 1 of the Commons Act 2006 or applicable transitional provisions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment