Philbin v Davies

Philbin v Davies

The statutory demand must be set aside because there is a real prospect that the applicant will succeed in establishing that the respondent, as mortgagee, failed to take reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale, and that the loan agreements may contain unfair terms and penalties under consumer legislation, which could reduce or extinguish the debt.

Parties
Applicant: Kevin Philbin; Respondent: Stewart Davies
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment
Outcome
Statutory demand set aside
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Mortgagee's Duty, Connected Sale, Valuation, Unfair Contract Terms, Consumer Credit Act, Penalties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Philbin

Applicant

Stewart Davies

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the statutory demand should be set aside due to genuine dispute on substantial grounds
  2. 2 Whether the mortgagee took reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale
  3. 3 Whether loan agreements contained unfair terms or penalties under consumer legislation

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory demand must be set aside because there is a real prospect that the applicant will succeed in establishing that the respondent, as mortgagee, failed to take reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale, and that the loan agreements may contain unfair terms and penalties under consumer legislation, which could reduce or extinguish the debt.

Court Disposition

Statutory demand set aside

Orders

  • Statutory demand issued by Stewart Davies against Kevin Philbin is set aside