Philbin v Davies
The statutory demand must be set aside because there is a real prospect that the applicant will succeed in establishing that the respondent, as mortgagee, failed to take reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale, and that the loan agreements may contain unfair terms and penalties under consumer legislation, which could reduce or extinguish the debt.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin Philbin; Respondent: Stewart Davies
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment
- Outcome
- Statutory demand set aside
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Mortgagee's Duty, Connected Sale, Valuation, Unfair Contract Terms, Consumer Credit Act, Penalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Philbin
Applicant
Stewart Davies
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand should be set aside due to genuine dispute on substantial grounds
- 2 Whether the mortgagee took reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale
- 3 Whether loan agreements contained unfair terms or penalties under consumer legislation
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demand must be set aside because there is a real prospect that the applicant will succeed in establishing that the respondent, as mortgagee, failed to take reasonable steps to obtain the best price in a connected sale, and that the loan agreements may contain unfair terms and penalties under consumer legislation, which could reduce or extinguish the debt.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand set aside
Orders
- Statutory demand issued by Stewart Davies against Kevin Philbin is set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment