Gloucestershire County Council, R (on the application of) v Keyway (Gloucester) Ltd. [2003] EWHC 3012 (Admin) (14 November 2003)
It is sufficient for the Planning Authority to prove that a stop notice was left at the registered office or principal office of the company under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972; it is not necessary to prove actual delivery to a director or secretary.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 3012 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gloucestershire County Council; Defendant: Keyway (Gloucester) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecutor's Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Preliminary Issue of Service of Stop Notice
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to Justices for continuation; respondent ordered to pay claimant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Legal Documents, Stop Notice Procedure, Enforcement Under Town and Country Planning Act, Corporate Service Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gloucestershire County Council
Claimant
Keyway (Gloucester) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecutor's Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Preliminary Issue of Service of Stop Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leaving a stop notice at a company's registered or principal office constitutes effective service under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972 and/or section 329 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether it is necessary to prove actual delivery to a director or secretary of the company
Ratio Decidendi
It is sufficient for the Planning Authority to prove that a stop notice was left at the registered office or principal office of the company under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972; it is not necessary to prove actual delivery to a director or secretary.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to Justices for continuation; respondent ordered to pay claimant's costs.
Orders
- Case remitted to Justices with answers to stated questions for continuation of hearing.
- Respondent to pay claimant's costs, summarily assessed at £6,759.91.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment