Gloucestershire County Council, R (on the application of) v Keyway (Gloucester) Ltd.
It is sufficient for the Planning Authority to prove that they have left a copy of the stop notice at the registered office or the principal office of the company under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972; it is not necessary to prove that the document has actually been delivered into the hands of a director or secretary of the company.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gloucestershire County Council; Defendant: Keyway (Gloucester) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (case Stated) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From Magistrates' Court to High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to Justices for further hearing; respondent to pay claimant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Documents, Stop Notice, Town and Country Planning Act, Local Government Act, Corporate Service Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gloucestershire County Council
Claimant
Keyway (Gloucester) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (case Stated) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From Magistrates' Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leaving a stop notice at the registered or principal office of a company constitutes effective service under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972 and/or section 329 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether it is necessary to prove actual delivery of the notice to a director or secretary of the company
Ratio Decidendi
It is sufficient for the Planning Authority to prove that they have left a copy of the stop notice at the registered office or the principal office of the company under section 233 of the Local Government Act 1972; it is not necessary to prove that the document has actually been delivered into the hands of a director or secretary of the company.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to Justices for further hearing; respondent to pay claimant's costs.
Orders
- Case remitted to the Justices with the High Court's answers to the questions stated for continuation of the hearing.
- Respondent to pay claimant's costs, summarily assessed at £6,759.91.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment