KGM v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 933 (25 May 2011)
The second and third respondents are entitled to their respective costs on a standard basis because, although they argued for indemnity costs due to unnecessary participation, there was insufficient justification for indemnity costs and no convincing reason for separate representation warranting such an order.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 933
- Parties
- Appellant: KGM; First Respondent: News Group Newspapers Limited; Second Respondent: MGN Limited; Third Respondent: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal
- Outcome
- Second and third respondents awarded costs on a standard basis
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Standard Basis Costs, Representation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KGM
Appellant
News Group Newspapers Limited
First Respondent
MGN Limited
Second Respondent
Associated Newspapers Limited
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second and third respondents should receive costs on a standard or indemnity basis
- 2 Whether separate representation for the second and third respondents was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The second and third respondents are entitled to their respective costs on a standard basis because, although they argued for indemnity costs due to unnecessary participation, there was insufficient justification for indemnity costs and no convincing reason for separate representation warranting such an order.
Court Disposition
Second and third respondents awarded costs on a standard basis
Orders
- Second and third respondents to have their respective costs on a standard basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment