KH v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive must be interpreted in accordance with international humanitarian law. Although Iraq is in a state of internal armed conflict, neither civilians in Iraq generally nor civilians in Kirkuk, including those of mixed Arab/Kurdish ethnicity, face a serious and individual...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: KH; Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Appeal / Country Guidance Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subsidiary Protection, Qualification Directive Article 15(c), Internal Armed Conflict, Indiscriminate Violence, Non Refoulement, Humanitarian Protection
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KH
Appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Appeal / Country Guidance Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive requires an international humanitarian law (IHL) interpretation
- 2 Whether the situation in Iraq constitutes an internal armed conflict for the purposes of Article 15(c)
- 3 Whether indiscriminate violence in Iraq or Kirkuk poses a serious and individual threat to civilians generally or to the appellant specifically
Ratio Decidendi
Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive must be interpreted in accordance with international humanitarian law. Although Iraq is in a state of internal armed conflict, neither civilians in Iraq generally nor civilians in Kirkuk, including those of mixed Arab/Kurdish ethnicity, face a serious and individual threat to their life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence within the meaning of Article 15(c) merely by virtue of being civilians. The appellant failed to demonstrate any specific personal circumstances or evidence of a consistent pattern of indiscriminate violence in his home area sufficient to meet the threshold for subsidiary protection under Article 15(c).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant's appeal is dismissed; he is not eligible for humanitarian protection under Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive or paragraph 339C of the Immigration Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment