Oudahar, R. v [2018] EWCA Crim 857 (27 February 2018)

Oudahar, R. v [2018] EWCA Crim 857 (27 February 2018)

There were no arguable grounds of appeal as all matters raised were dealt with at trial, properly summed up by the judge, and the jury's verdict was based on their assessment of the evidence. The application was wholly unmeritorious and misconceived.

Citation
[2018] EWCA Crim 857
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Khaled Oudahar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Rape, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Appeal Against Conviction, Loss of Time Order
Criminal Law Rape Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Appeal Against Conviction Loss of Time Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Khaled Oudahar

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape and assault occasioning actual bodily harm was unsafe
  2. 2 Whether there were errors in the trial process justifying leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds of appeal as all matters raised were dealt with at trial, properly summed up by the judge, and the jury's verdict was based on their assessment of the evidence. The application was wholly unmeritorious and misconceived.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • 42 days loss of time under the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 and the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985