Khan v Royal Mail Group Ltd & Ors
The Employment Tribunal correctly applied the burden of proof provisions, made positive findings of fact, and Mr Khan failed to establish the primary facts necessary for the burden to shift; any misdirection in phrasing was not material to the outcome.
- Parties
- Appellant: Khalid Khan; Respondent: Royal Mail Group Ltd & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Discrimination, Victimisation, Harassment, Race Relations, Religion or Belief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khalid Khan
Appellant
Royal Mail Group Ltd & Ors
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal correctly applied the burden of proof in discrimination and victimisation claims
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal correctly applied the burden of proof provisions, made positive findings of fact, and Mr Khan failed to establish the primary facts necessary for the burden to shift; any misdirection in phrasing was not material to the outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment