REGINA v KHALID YUSUF

REGINA v KHALID YUSUF

The sentence imposed was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive, as the sentencing judge properly aggregated the offences, considered the applicant's dangerousness, applied the totality principle, and gave appropriate credit for mitigation and guilty plea.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Khalid Yusuf
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Robbery, Blackmail, Appeals, Mitigation, Dangerous Offender, Extended Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Robbery Blackmail Appeals Mitigation Dangerous Offender Extended Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Khalid Yusuf

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to give proper discount for personal mitigation and guilty plea
  3. 3 Whether the aggregation of sentences was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive, as the sentencing judge properly aggregated the offences, considered the applicant's dangerousness, applied the totality principle, and gave appropriate credit for mitigation and guilty plea.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal against sentence refused