Payne, R. v

Payne, R. v

The sentence imposed was within the appropriate range, not manifestly excessive, and the judge correctly balanced aggravating and mitigating features, applying the relevant guideline and exercising discretion regarding the appellant's age.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Kiall Payne
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Youth Offenders, Appeals
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences Youth Offenders Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Kiall Payne

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age and circumstances
  2. 2 Appropriate application of sentencing guidelines for youth offenders

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was within the appropriate range, not manifestly excessive, and the judge correctly balanced aggravating and mitigating features, applying the relevant guideline and exercising discretion regarding the appellant's age.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence imposed by the Crown Court stands.