Kimber, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 71 (19th December, 2000)
The summing-up to the jury of the medical evidence on provocation was not adequate in light of the recent House of Lords decision in R v Smith (Morgan), necessitating the quashing of the conviction and ordering of a retrial.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Crim 71
- Parties
- Appellant: Kimber; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- conviction quashed, retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Provocation, Jury Directions, Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kimber
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summing-up of medical evidence on provocation was adequate in light of recent case law
- 2 Whether the conviction for murder should be quashed and a retrial ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The summing-up to the jury of the medical evidence on provocation was not adequate in light of the recent House of Lords decision in R v Smith (Morgan), necessitating the quashing of the conviction and ordering of a retrial.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed, retrial ordered
Orders
- Conviction for murder quashed
- Retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment