Burger King v King Franchises

Burger King v King Franchises

The Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim. There is no credible evidence of duress, coercion, or lack of authority. The Defendants ratified or are estopped from denying the agreements. There is no waiver by the Claimants, and the existence of related proceedings in Cyprus does not justify staying the case.

Parties
Claimant: Burger King; Defendant: King Franchises
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the Claimants
Legal Topics
Franchise Agreements, Termination of Contract, Summary Judgment, Economic Duress, Authority of Company Officers, Waiver, Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Burger King

Claimant

King Franchises

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants have a real prospect of successfully defending the claim for termination of franchise and development agreements
  2. 2 Whether the Settlement Agreement was entered into under duress, coercion, or undue influence
  3. 3 Whether the individuals signing the agreements had authority to bind the Defendants

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim. There is no credible evidence of duress, coercion, or lack of authority. The Defendants ratified or are estopped from denying the agreements. There is no waiver by the Claimants, and the existence of related proceedings in Cyprus does not justify staying the case.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the Claimants

Orders

  • Declaration of right to terminate relevant contracts
  • Damages and other relief to be assessed