Aidid v The Queen (Rev 1)

Aidid v The Queen (Rev 1)

The judge's directions, though brief, sufficiently reflected the required legal principles regarding intoxication and intent. The jury was properly directed to consider whether the appellant, despite intoxication and lack of sleep, had the necessary intent for murder. The conviction is safe.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Kinse Aidid; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 April 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
Legal Topics
Murder, Manslaughter, Intoxication, Jury Directions, Mens Rea
Criminal Law Murder Manslaughter Intoxication Jury Directions Mens Rea

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinse Aidid

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in law by failing to direct the jury adequately on the effect of intoxication on the appellant's intent for murder

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's directions, though brief, sufficiently reflected the required legal principles regarding intoxication and intent. The jury was properly directed to consider whether the appellant, despite intoxication and lack of sleep, had the necessary intent for murder. The conviction is safe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld