Wood & Anor v Mistry
Mr Mistry dishonestly caused sums to be paid for his benefit from liquidation estates of companies he was liquidator for, approved false invoices, and failed to recover monies owed by Safe Solutions Companies, constituting serious misconduct and breach of duty under section 4(1)(b) of the CDDA, warranting a disqualification order.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicholas Stewart Wood; Claimant: James Earp; Defendant: Kirankumar Mistry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Proceedings / Judgment
- Outcome
- disqualification order granted
- Legal Topics
- Company Directors Disqualification, Liquidator Misconduct, Fraudulent Trading, Breach of Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Stewart Wood
Claimant
James Earp
Claimant
Kirankumar Mistry
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Proceedings / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Mistry committed fraud or breach of duty as liquidator under section 4(1)(b) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
- 2 Whether the claimants have standing to bring the application under section 16(2) of the CDDA
- 3 Whether Mr Mistry failed to take steps to recover monies owed to the companies by Safe Solutions Companies
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Mistry dishonestly caused sums to be paid for his benefit from liquidation estates of companies he was liquidator for, approved false invoices, and failed to recover monies owed by Safe Solutions Companies, constituting serious misconduct and breach of duty under section 4(1)(b) of the CDDA, warranting a disqualification order.
Court Disposition
disqualification order granted
Orders
- A 12-year disqualification order is made against Mr Kirankumar Mistry under section 4 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment