R v Kirk Daniels

R v Kirk Daniels

There was no good reason for the lengthy delay in applying for leave to appeal, and the grounds advanced—ineffective assistance of counsel, disclosure failures, and new evidence—were wholly without merit, unevidenced, and/or speculative. The applicant was properly represented, disclosure was adequate, and no new evidence was identified that could have affected the outcome.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Kirk Daniels
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Conviction, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Disclosure, New Evidence
Criminal Law Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Conviction Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Disclosure New Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Kirk Daniels

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was good reason for the 6.5 year delay in applying for leave to appeal against conviction
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was properly represented at trial
  3. 3 Whether there were disclosure failures affecting the fairness of the trial

Ratio Decidendi

There was no good reason for the lengthy delay in applying for leave to appeal, and the grounds advanced—ineffective assistance of counsel, disclosure failures, and new evidence—were wholly without merit, unevidenced, and/or speculative. The applicant was properly represented, disclosure was adequate, and no new evidence was identified that could have affected the outcome.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Extension of time refused
  • Leave to appeal refused