Kirklees Council v X & Ors

Kirklees Council v X & Ors

On the balance of probabilities, Y and Z were sexually abused by their uncle FA, physically and emotionally abused by their grandparents GM and GF, and subjected to emotional pressure by GM to retract their allegations. The evidence of Y and Z was consistent, corroborated, and credible, while the denials and explanations of FA, GM, and GF were not credible. The findings sought by the local authority are proved.

Parties
Applicant: Kirklees Council; 1st Respondent (mother of K and L): X; 2nd Respondent (father of L): MS; 3rd Respondent (father of K): SU; 4th & 5th Respondents (great Grandparents of K and L, Paternal Grandparents of A, B, C): GM & GF; Children (respondents): K & L (Children); 1st Respondent (mother of A, B, C): SB; 2nd Respondent (father of A, B, C; Uncle to Y and Z): FA; Children (respondents): A, B & C (Children)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 August 2015
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Fact Finding Judgment
Outcome
Findings for the applicant local authority; all findings sought are proved on the balance of probabilities.
Legal Topics
Care Proceedings, Sexual Abuse, Physical Abuse, Emotional Abuse, Standard of Proof, Evidential Assessment
Family Law Child Protection Care Proceedings Sexual Abuse Physical Abuse Emotional Abuse Standard of Proof Evidential Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kirklees Council

Applicant

X

1st Respondent (mother of K and L)

MS

2nd Respondent (father of L)

SU

3rd Respondent (father of K)

GM & GF

4th & 5th Respondents (great Grandparents of K and L, Paternal Grandparents of A, B, C)

K & L (Children)

Children (respondents)

SB

1st Respondent (mother of A, B, C)

FA

2nd Respondent (father of A, B, C; Uncle to Y and Z)

A, B & C (Children)

Children (respondents)

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Fact Finding Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Y and Z were sexually abused by their uncle FA
  2. 2 Whether Y and Z were physically and emotionally abused by their grandparents GM and GF
  3. 3 Whether GM and GF failed to protect Y and Z from sexual abuse

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, Y and Z were sexually abused by their uncle FA, physically and emotionally abused by their grandparents GM and GF, and subjected to emotional pressure by GM to retract their allegations. The evidence of Y and Z was consistent, corroborated, and credible, while the denials and explanations of FA, GM, and GF were not credible. The findings sought by the local authority are proved.

Court Disposition

Findings for the applicant local authority; all findings sought are proved on the balance of probabilities.

Orders

  • Findings of sexual abuse by FA against Y and Z
  • Findings of physical and emotional abuse by GM and GF against Y and Z