Department of Work and Pensions v Kole- Emmanuel
The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof that his realisable assets are inadequate to satisfy the confiscation order, particularly in light of evidence of hidden assets and the insufficiency of the official receiver's report. The application for a certificate of inadequacy is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Department of Work and Pensions; Defendant: Kole-Emmanuel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Certificate of Inadequacy / Judgment on Renewed Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Certificate of Inadequacy, Burden of Proof, Bankruptcy and Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Department of Work and Pensions
Claimant
Kole-Emmanuel
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Certificate of Inadequacy / Judgment on Renewed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has discharged the burden of proof to show inadequacy of realisable assets to satisfy the confiscation order
- 2 Whether bankruptcy and the official receiver's report suffice as evidence of inadequacy
- 3 Whether the matter should be adjourned for further evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof that his realisable assets are inadequate to satisfy the confiscation order, particularly in light of evidence of hidden assets and the insufficiency of the official receiver's report. The application for a certificate of inadequacy is dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for certificate of inadequacy dismissed
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs via summary bill of costs within 7 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment