Zwiebel & Anor v Konig

Zwiebel & Anor v Konig

There is a reasonably arguable point of construction as to whether the arbitral award is valid and enforceable in light of the ambiguity between paragraphs A and B and the absence of further clarification; permission to appeal is granted on this issue.

Parties
Applicants: Zwiebel & Anr; Respondent: Konig
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal (renewed Application)
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted (on construction issue only)
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Interpretation of Arbitral Awards, Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
Arbitration Civil Procedure Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Interpretation of Arbitral Awards Setting Aside Arbitral Awards

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zwiebel & Anr

Applicants

Konig

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal (renewed Application)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award of 9 July 2008 is valid and enforceable given the ambiguity between paragraphs A and B and the absence of further clarification by the tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

There is a reasonably arguable point of construction as to whether the arbitral award is valid and enforceable in light of the ambiguity between paragraphs A and B and the absence of further clarification; permission to appeal is granted on this issue.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted (on construction issue only)

Orders

  • Permission to appeal is granted on the issue of construction of the arbitral award.