Vivian v Koningsveld & Ors
The court found clear and cogent evidence of a specific common intention to sever joint tenancies to achieve inheritance tax savings, and that the deed of variation failed to reflect this intention due to a mistake. Rectification was granted to mirror the deed of rectification already executed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Vivian; Defendant: Koningsveld; Defendant: Unnamed Defendant 2; Defendant: Unnamed Defendant 3
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for rectification granted.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Deeds, Inheritance Tax, Mistake in Legal Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vivian
Claimant
Koningsveld
Defendant
Unnamed Defendant 2
Defendant
Unnamed Defendant 3
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deed of variation should be rectified to reflect the parties' true intention regarding severance of joint tenancies and inheritance tax mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The court found clear and cogent evidence of a specific common intention to sever joint tenancies to achieve inheritance tax savings, and that the deed of variation failed to reflect this intention due to a mistake. Rectification was granted to mirror the deed of rectification already executed.
Court Disposition
Order for rectification granted.
Orders
- The deed of variation is rectified to mirror the terms of the deed of rectification executed by the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment