Dunn v Kazolides [2025] EWHC 2212 (Ch) (22 August 2025)

Dunn v Kazolides [2025] EWHC 2212 (Ch) (22 August 2025)

Clause 18 of the JVA constitutes a valid guarantee by Mr Kazolides and Mr Stylianou, enforceable by necessary implication; however, any claim under the guarantee is statute barred as the cause of action accrued more than 12 years before the claim was issued, due to the Company's insolvency by March 2010.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 2212 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Peter Scholey Dunn; Defendant: Kostas Kazolides
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Guarantee Validity, Statute of Frauds, Limitation Period, Contractual Interpretation, Loss Sharing, Authority of Attorney
Contract Law Company Law Guarantee Law Guarantee Validity Statute of Frauds Limitation Period Contractual Interpretation Loss Sharing +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Scholey Dunn

Claimant

Kostas Kazolides

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Kazolides provided a valid guarantee under the JVA
  2. 2 Whether the guarantee clause is enforceable against Mr Kazolides
  3. 3 Whether claims under the guarantee are statute barred

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 18 of the JVA constitutes a valid guarantee by Mr Kazolides and Mr Stylianou, enforceable by necessary implication; however, any claim under the guarantee is statute barred as the cause of action accrued more than 12 years before the claim was issued, due to the Company's insolvency by March 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim against Mr Kazolides under guarantee dismissed as statute barred
  • No rectification of JVA