R v Kozhem Nawzad Noori

R v Kozhem Nawzad Noori

The sentence imposed was within the permissible range given aggravating features and the need for deterrence, but the appellant was entitled to full credit for the guilty plea, and the deportation recommendation was quashed due to procedural and jurisdictional reasons.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Kozhem Nawzad Noori
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 January 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Possession of Identity Document With Improper Intention, Sentencing, Deportation Recommendation, Credit for Guilty Plea
Criminal Law Immigration Law Possession of Identity Document With Improper Intention Sentencing Deportation Recommendation Credit for Guilty Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Kozhem Nawzad Noori

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the sentence imposed excessive compared to precedent?
  2. 2 Should greater credit for the guilty plea have been given?
  3. 3 Was the deportation recommendation valid without statutory notice?

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was within the permissible range given aggravating features and the need for deterrence, but the appellant was entitled to full credit for the guilty plea, and the deportation recommendation was quashed due to procedural and jurisdictional reasons.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Judge's sentence quashed and replaced with 58 weeks' imprisonment.
  • Deportation recommendation quashed.