Krupeckiene v Public Prosecutor's Office Lithuania
The appeal is not arguable because the binding domestic and CJEU authorities establish that the Prosecutor General’s Office in Lithuania is a ‘judicial authority’ for the purposes of section 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 and the Framework Decision; recent CJEU decisions do not undermine this position.
- Parties
- Appellant: Krupeckiene; Respondent: Public Prosecutor’s Office Lithuania
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal And, If Granted, Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Judicial Authority Definition, Mutual Recognition, Domestic Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Krupeckiene
Appellant
Public Prosecutor’s Office Lithuania
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal And, If Granted, Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Prosecutor General’s Office in Lithuania is a ‘judicial authority’ for the purposes of section 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 and the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA
- 2 Whether recent CJEU decisions affect the binding nature of the Supreme Court’s decision in Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is not arguable because the binding domestic and CJEU authorities establish that the Prosecutor General’s Office in Lithuania is a ‘judicial authority’ for the purposes of section 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 and the Framework Decision; recent CJEU decisions do not undermine this position.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused.
- No reference to the CJEU to be made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment