Rowinska, Re [2005] EWHC 2794 (Ch) (18 November 2005)
The court found that although forgery was not proved on the balance of probabilities, the suspicion regarding Maria Rowinska's knowledge and approval of the will was not removed. The evidence did not satisfy the court that Maria Rowinska knew and approved the contents of the will dated 19 February 2002, and probate was refused.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 2794 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Stanislaw Wyniczenko; Defendant: Krysytyna Plucinska-Surowka
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Probate refused for the will dated 19 February 2002
- Legal Topics
- Forgery of Will, Knowledge and Approval, Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanislaw Wyniczenko
Claimant
Krysytyna Plucinska-Surowka
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will dated 19 February 2002 was forged
- 2 Whether Maria Rowinska knew and approved the contents of the will
- 3 Whether Maria Rowinska had testamentary capacity
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although forgery was not proved on the balance of probabilities, the suspicion regarding Maria Rowinska's knowledge and approval of the will was not removed. The evidence did not satisfy the court that Maria Rowinska knew and approved the contents of the will dated 19 February 2002, and probate was refused.
Court Disposition
Probate refused for the will dated 19 February 2002
Orders
- The claim for probate of the will dated 19 February 2002 is dismissed
- Costs to be determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment