Beddoes & Ors, R v
The starting point of 23 years was excessive given the circumstances; a 20-year starting point after trial is appropriate for those most heavily involved. Sentences must reflect seriousness, harm, and deterrence, but also absence of intent to injure and actual injury.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kurt Richard Beddoes; Appellant: Craig Cartwright; Appellant: Ian Ellis; Appellant: Anthony Bushell; Appellant: Thomas Whittingham; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part; sentences reduced
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Explosives, Burglary, Sentencing, Deterrence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kurt Richard Beddoes
Appellant
Craig Cartwright
Appellant
Ian Ellis
Appellant
Anthony Bushell
Appellant
Thomas Whittingham
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the starting point for sentencing was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate sentencing for conspiracy to cause explosions and burglary of commercial premises
- 3 Assessment of individual roles and culpability
Ratio Decidendi
The starting point of 23 years was excessive given the circumstances; a 20-year starting point after trial is appropriate for those most heavily involved. Sentences must reflect seriousness, harm, and deterrence, but also absence of intent to injure and actual injury.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part; sentences reduced
Orders
- Sentences imposed below quashed
- Substituted concurrent sentences: Beddoes, 15 years and 7 years; Cartwright, 15 years and 7 years; Ellis, 11 years and 6 years; Bushell, 15 years and 7 years; Whittingham, 16 years and 7 years imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment