Miah, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 968 (05 July 2017)
The applicant was not entitled to full credit for his guilty plea as he did not plead at the first reasonable opportunity; the judge's methodology for estimating drug quantity was fair; the ramming of the police car was a significant aggravating feature justifying an increased sentence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 968
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Kurush Miah
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs, Credit for Guilty Plea, Aggravating Features
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Kurush Miah
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to full credit for guilty plea
- 2 Whether the judge's methodology for estimating drug quantity was accurate
- 3 Whether undue weight was given to the ramming of the police car as an aggravating feature
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was not entitled to full credit for his guilty plea as he did not plead at the first reasonable opportunity; the judge's methodology for estimating drug quantity was fair; the ramming of the police car was a significant aggravating feature justifying an increased sentence.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- 28 days of time spent in custody not to count towards total sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment