KW, R (on the application of) v Special Educational Needs Tribunal & Anor
The Tribunal did not err in law; it did not require the parents to provide part of the child's special educational provision, and the LEA's scheme appropriately provided for the child's needs without unlawfully imposing a burden on the parents.
- Parties
- Appellant: KW; Respondent: Special Educational Needs Tribunal; Respondent: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Special Educational Needs, Statutory Duty of Local Education Authority, Residential School Placement, Educational Provision Definition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KW
Appellant
Special Educational Needs Tribunal
Respondent
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by allowing the LEA to place part of the special educational provision burden on the parents
- 2 Whether a residential school placement is required to meet the child's special educational needs
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law; it did not require the parents to provide part of the child's special educational provision, and the LEA's scheme appropriately provided for the child's needs without unlawfully imposing a burden on the parents.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment