KY v DD

KY v DD

The without notice application was not properly supported by evidence, and the passport order was discharged after it was revealed that the alleged threats were from a different case. The court emphasised strict adherence to procedural requirements and evidential scrutiny for ex parte relief.

Parties
Applicant: KY; Respondent: DD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Family / Judgment
Outcome
Prohibited steps order granted; wardship discharged; passport order discharged.
Legal Topics
Wardship, Without Notice Applications, Prohibited Steps Orders, Passport Orders
Family Law Wardship Without Notice Applications Prohibited Steps Orders Passport Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KY

Applicant

DD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the without notice application was justified and properly supported by evidence
  2. 2 Whether proper procedures were followed in seeking ex parte relief
  3. 3 Whether the passport order was warranted based on the information provided

Ratio Decidendi

The without notice application was not properly supported by evidence, and the passport order was discharged after it was revealed that the alleged threats were from a different case. The court emphasised strict adherence to procedural requirements and evidential scrutiny for ex parte relief.

Court Disposition

Prohibited steps order granted; wardship discharged; passport order discharged.

Orders

  • Prohibited steps order preventing removal of child from mother's care.
  • Wardship discharged.