KY v DD [2011] EWHC 1277 (Fam) (23 May 2011)
The without notice application was not properly justified by urgency or supported by sufficient evidence; the passport order was discharged, and the court reiterated the strict procedural and evidential requirements for such applications to prevent misuse and protect the rights of respondents.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1277 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: KY; Respondent: DD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Wardship / Family Law Without Notice Application / Judgment Following Without Notice Application and Subsequent Return Hearing
- Outcome
- Passport order discharged; prohibited steps order made; wardship discharged; directions for written explanations from applicant's legal representatives.
- Legal Topics
- Without Notice Applications, Wardship, Prohibited Steps Orders, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KY
Applicant
DD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Wardship / Family Law Without Notice Application / Judgment Following Without Notice Application and Subsequent Return Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the procedural requirements and evidential standards for without notice applications in family proceedings?
- 2 Was the without notice application in this case properly supported by evidence and justified by urgency?
Ratio Decidendi
The without notice application was not properly justified by urgency or supported by sufficient evidence; the passport order was discharged, and the court reiterated the strict procedural and evidential requirements for such applications to prevent misuse and protect the rights of respondents.
Court Disposition
Passport order discharged; prohibited steps order made; wardship discharged; directions for written explanations from applicant's legal representatives.
Orders
- Passport order discharged
- Prohibited steps order preventing removal of child from mother's care
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment