R v Kyle Woods

R v Kyle Woods

The judge properly considered the appellant's personal mitigation, the absence of intent to cause really serious harm, the high degree of recklessness, and aggravating factors. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the circumstances and consequences for the victim.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Kyle Woods
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving, Grievous Bodily Harm, Intent to Resist Arrest, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Recklessness
Criminal Law Dangerous Driving Grievous Bodily Harm Intent to Resist Arrest Sentencing Guidelines Mitigation Recklessness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Kyle Woods

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the sentence for causing grievous bodily harm with intent to resist arrest manifestly excessive?
  2. 2 Did the judge properly account for the distinction between intent to cause serious harm and intent to evade arrest?
  3. 3 Were aggravating and mitigating factors properly considered?

Ratio Decidendi

The judge properly considered the appellant's personal mitigation, the absence of intent to cause really serious harm, the high degree of recklessness, and aggravating factors. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the circumstances and consequences for the victim.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of 6 years and 4 months' imprisonment for grievous bodily harm with intent to resist apprehension upheld
  • driving disqualification for 8 years and 2 months and extended re-test order upheld