A v L [2010] EWHC 460 (Fam) (11 March 2010)
The English court refused to recognise the Egyptian divorce because the wife was not given notice or opportunity to participate, in breach of s.51(3)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986. The court found it had jurisdiction based on the wife's domicile and granted the divorce on the grounds of the husband's unreasonable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 460 (Fam)
- Parties
- Petitioner: A; Respondent: L
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition (defended) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Petition granted; divorce decree pronounced; Egyptian divorce not recognised.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Jurisdiction, Recognition of Foreign Divorces, Unreasonable Behaviour, Ancillary Relief, Public Policy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Petitioner
L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition (defended) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction to grant a divorce to the petitioner wife
- 2 Whether the Egyptian divorce obtained by the husband should be recognised under the Family Law Act 1986
- 3 Whether the husband's conduct amounts to unreasonable behaviour justifying divorce
Ratio Decidendi
The English court refused to recognise the Egyptian divorce because the wife was not given notice or opportunity to participate, in breach of s.51(3)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986. The court found it had jurisdiction based on the wife's domicile and granted the divorce on the grounds of the husband's unreasonable behaviour.
Court Disposition
Petition granted; divorce decree pronounced; Egyptian divorce not recognised.
Orders
- Decree of divorce granted to the wife on grounds of unreasonable behaviour.
- Egyptian divorce not recognised under the Family Law Act 1986.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment