Barclays Bank Plc v L. Londell McMIllan
The Loan Agreement clearly made Mr McMillan the borrower personally liable for repayment; the agreement was not a sham; non-receipt of proceeds did not affect liability as the Firm was his agent for drawdown; there was no misrepresentation or unremedied event of default; the relationship was not unfair under the Consumer Credit Act; and the Bank owed no duty to advise Mr McMillan.
- Parties
- Claimant: Barclays Bank PLC; Defendant: L. Londell McMillan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Loan Agreements, Personal Liability of Partners, Sham Transactions, Unfair Debtor Creditor Relationships, Misrepresentation, Breach of Duty to Advise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barclays Bank PLC
Claimant
L. Londell McMillan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr McMillan is personally liable for repayment of the loan under the Loan Agreement
- 2 Whether the Loan Agreement was a sham
- 3 Whether non-receipt of loan proceeds by Mr McMillan affects liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Loan Agreement clearly made Mr McMillan the borrower personally liable for repayment; the agreement was not a sham; non-receipt of proceeds did not affect liability as the Firm was his agent for drawdown; there was no misrepresentation or unremedied event of default; the relationship was not unfair under the Consumer Credit Act; and the Bank owed no duty to advise Mr McMillan.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant
Orders
- Mr McMillan to pay the principal sum of US$540,000 plus interest to be quantified following judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment