LA MICRO GROUP (UK) LIMITED v LA MICRO GROUP INC

LA MICRO GROUP (UK) LIMITED v LA MICRO GROUP INC

The claimants and Mr Lyampert, as the successful parties, are entitled to their costs without apportionment, as the complexity of the issues justified advancing alternative legal bases, and there is no justification for permission to appeal or for a stay of the order.

Parties
Claimant: LA Micro Group (UK) Limited; Claimant: David Bell; Defendant: LA Micro Group Inc; Defendant: Roman Frenkel; Defendant: Arkadiy Lyampert
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Decision on Costs and Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Costs awarded to claimants and Mr Lyampert; permission to appeal refused; no stay of order granted.
Legal Topics
Costs, Proprietary Estoppel, Beneficial Ownership, Permission to Appeal
Civil Procedure Equity Company Law Costs Proprietary Estoppel Beneficial Ownership Permission to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LA Micro Group (UK) Limited

Claimant

David Bell

Claimant

LA Micro Group Inc

Defendant

Roman Frenkel

Defendant

Arkadiy Lyampert

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Decision on Costs and Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs should be apportioned given partial success on remitted issues
  2. 2 Whether permission to appeal should be granted based on alleged inconsistencies in the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants and Mr Lyampert, as the successful parties, are entitled to their costs without apportionment, as the complexity of the issues justified advancing alternative legal bases, and there is no justification for permission to appeal or for a stay of the order.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to claimants and Mr Lyampert; permission to appeal refused; no stay of order granted.

Orders

  • Inc and Mr Frenkel to pay the costs of the claimants and Mr Lyampert.
  • No apportionment of costs; full costs awarded.