R v Lacey Langton

R v Lacey Langton

The judge was correct to place the offence in culpability category A due to the sustained conduct and seriousness of the underlying offence, and the mitigation was properly accounted for. Suspension of sentence was not warranted given the nature of the offence and established legal principles.

Parties
Applicant: Lacey Langton; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Perverting the Course of Justice, Possession of Identity Documents, Sentencing, Suspension of Sentence
Criminal Law Perverting the Course of Justice Possession of Identity Documents Sentencing Suspension of Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lacey Langton

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the starting point for sentencing too high?
  2. 2 Should the sentence have been suspended?

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was correct to place the offence in culpability category A due to the sustained conduct and seriousness of the underlying offence, and the mitigation was properly accounted for. Suspension of sentence was not warranted given the nature of the offence and established legal principles.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence of 14 months' imprisonment stands.
  • No suspension of sentence.