Farnsworth v Lacy And Ors
The first and fourth defendants deliberately breached an unambiguous Consent Order by working for a competitor, constituting contempt of court. The breaches were serious and aggravated by concealment and occurred shortly after the order. Mitigation included admission, apology, cooperation, and good character. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: F W Farnsworth; Defendant: Lacy; Defendant: Court-Johnston; Defendant: Third Defendant (unnamed corporate entity)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Application / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendants found in contempt; custodial sentences suspended; fine imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Breach of Consent Order, Restrictive Covenants, Injunctions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F W Farnsworth
Claimant
Lacy
Defendant
Court-Johnston
Defendant
Third Defendant (unnamed corporate entity)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants breached the Consent Order by working for a competitor
- 2 Whether the breaches constituted contempt of court
- 3 Whether the Consent Order was unambiguous and enforceable without penal notice
Ratio Decidendi
The first and fourth defendants deliberately breached an unambiguous Consent Order by working for a competitor, constituting contempt of court. The breaches were serious and aggravated by concealment and occurred shortly after the order. Mitigation included admission, apology, cooperation, and good character. The third defendant is fined as sequestration is inappropriate.
Court Disposition
Defendants found in contempt; custodial sentences suspended; fine imposed.
Orders
- Six months imprisonment for first and fourth defendants, suspended for 18 months conditional on compliance with court orders.
- Fine of £15,000 imposed on third defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment