Montlake & Ors (As Trustees of Wasps Football Club) v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd [2004] EWHC 1503 (Comm) (08 July 2004)
Wasps are entitled to recover their success fee despite procedural breaches because LSH had full knowledge of the CFA and suffered no prejudice. Wasps are entitled to their costs on an indemnity basis from 13 January 2004, and to enhanced interest on damages at 6% from 13 January 2004 to 28 May 2004, having beaten their Part 36 offer. A stay on costs is granted pending appeal, with liberty to apply to lift the stay if the appeal is not pursued expeditiously.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 1503 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ivor Alexander Montlake, Peter George Yarranton and Donald Wills (as trustees of WASPS Football Club); Defendant: Lambert Smith Hampton Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Post Trial Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Costs in favour of claimants, with stay pending appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements, Part 36 Offers, Relief From Sanctions, Valuation of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ivor Alexander Montlake, Peter George Yarranton and Donald Wills (as trustees of WASPS Football Club)
Claimant
Lambert Smith Hampton Group Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Post Trial Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to recover their success fee under a CFA despite procedural breaches
- 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to costs and on what basis
- 3 Whether enhanced interest should be awarded under CPR 36.21
Ratio Decidendi
Wasps are entitled to recover their success fee despite procedural breaches because LSH had full knowledge of the CFA and suffered no prejudice. Wasps are entitled to their costs on an indemnity basis from 13 January 2004, and to enhanced interest on damages at 6% from 13 January 2004 to 28 May 2004, having beaten their Part 36 offer. A stay on costs is granted pending appeal, with liberty to apply to lift the stay if the appeal is not pursued expeditiously.
Court Disposition
Costs in favour of claimants, with stay pending appeal.
Orders
- Claimants awarded costs of proceedings on indemnity basis from 13 January 2004.
- Claimants awarded enhanced interest at 6% on principal sum from 13 January 2004 to 28 May 2004.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment