Lloyds TSB v Lampert [2003] EWHC 9023 (Costs) (20 February 2003)

Lloyds TSB v Lampert [2003] EWHC 9023 (Costs) (20 February 2003)

The Deputy Costs Judge committed a serious procedural irregularity by failing to apply the proportionality test globally at the outset as required by Lownds v Home Office, necessitating reconsideration of the assessment.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 9023 (Costs)
Parties
Claimant: Lloyds TSB; Defendant: Lampert
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Appeal / Appeal From Detailed Assessment Before Deputy Costs Judge
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; matter remitted for reconsideration; costs of appeal awarded against successful defendant.
Legal Topics
Proportionality of Costs, Detailed Assessment, Procedural Irregularity
Civil Procedure Costs Proportionality of Costs Detailed Assessment Procedural Irregularity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lloyds TSB

Claimant

Lampert

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment Appeal / Appeal From Detailed Assessment Before Deputy Costs Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Deputy Costs Judge failed to apply the proportionality test as set out in Lownds v Home Office
  2. 2 Whether the assessment of costs was conducted on a necessity basis prior to reasonableness

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Costs Judge committed a serious procedural irregularity by failing to apply the proportionality test globally at the outset as required by Lownds v Home Office, necessitating reconsideration of the assessment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; matter remitted for reconsideration; costs of appeal awarded against successful defendant.

Orders

  • Matter remitted to the same Deputy Costs Judge for reconsideration in light of Lownds v Home Office.
  • Successful defendant to pay costs of the appeal.