Dynniq UK Ltd v Lancashire County Council
The contract clearly provides that traffic safety and management costs are generally included in the prices for other items in the Price List and are only to be measured and paid for separately when instructed on a Task Order for the exclusive use by or for the benefit of the defendant or a third party. The claimant's interpretation is inconsistent with the clear language of sub-paragraph 2 (xxviii) and the Note at the start of Series 100. The exception is not surplusage or inoperative, and the bespoke provisions override any contrary standard form provisions.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dynniq UK Limited; Defendant: Lancashire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contractual Interpretation) / Judgment on Part 8 Claim
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed in substantial part; limited declaration granted in terms of the contract's exception clause.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contractual Terms, Measurement and Payment Clauses, Bespoke Contract Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dynniq UK Limited
Claimant
Lancashire County Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contractual Interpretation) / Judgment on Part 8 Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper interpretation of sub-paragraph 2 (xxviii) of the Preamble and the Note at the start of Series 100 of the Price List in the contract between the parties
- 2 Whether traffic safety and management items are to be measured and paid for separately in all cases or only in the defined exception
Ratio Decidendi
The contract clearly provides that traffic safety and management costs are generally included in the prices for other items in the Price List and are only to be measured and paid for separately when instructed on a Task Order for the exclusive use by or for the benefit of the defendant or a third party. The claimant's interpretation is inconsistent with the clear language of sub-paragraph 2 (xxviii) and the Note at the start of Series 100. The exception is not surplusage or inoperative, and the bespoke provisions override any contrary standard form provisions.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed in substantial part; limited declaration granted in terms of the contract's exception clause.
Orders
- Declarations (a)(i) and (ii) refused.
- Declaration in terms of the exception (as per sub-paragraph 2 (xxviii) and the Note) granted, with language to reflect the contract wording.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment